In this proposal, there are voices that argue that the protocol fee is not a good approach. This is because the original LPs have already accepted low fees as a reward under certain risks (temporary loss, IL). While incentivizing people to hold UNI may be right, Uniswap should find a way to gain “additional” value in transactions to reward UNI holders. For example, Uniswap can actively generate profits through a series of arbitrage trades.
What are the internal and external concerns of the UNI profit-sharing proposal? Does the Uniswap proposal aim to challenge SEC regulation?