The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently approved the listing of an Ethereum native token, ETH, as an ETF, following key rule changes. This unexpected move has raised questions among many industry observers about the motivation behind this decision and its potential impact on Ethereum and other major cryptocurrencies.
CoinDesk’s editorial attempts to address several commonly asked questions.
Question 1: Is there a political motive behind the decision?
Changes in cryptocurrency regulations?
Impact of legislative actions
Support from former President Trump
Question 2: What is the impact on Ethereum?
Increased institutional interest
Potential changes in market dynamics
Clarification of regulatory status
Positive impact on the Ethereum ecosystem
Staking economy
Consolidation of Ethereum’s position
Question 3: What are the opportunities for other blockchains?
Prospects for other chains
Financial institutions need assistance
The timing of the SEC’s approval has sparked speculation about the political motives behind it. Just a few days before the announcement, the US House of Representatives passed the significant cryptocurrency-specific legislation, FIT 21. Moreover, bipartisan efforts have recently been made in Congress to repeal the controversial SEC cryptocurrency custody accounting rules, indicating a possible shift in the regulatory environment.
In these legislative actions, the Democratic Party has been actively involved, suggesting a softening stance by the US government towards cryptocurrencies. President Biden’s decision not to veto the cryptocurrency market structure bill, FIT 21, signifies a major concession. This political context may influence SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s attitude towards cryptocurrency regulations, considering that a stricter stance may become a political burden.
Furthermore, the recent support for cryptocurrencies by former President Trump has also had an additional impact. Gensler may believe that continuing to reject the ETH ETF is politically disadvantageous, especially considering Trump’s support.
The approval of the ETH ETF is expected to significantly increase institutional interest in Ethereum. This move not only provides recognition but also offers a familiar investment tool for various investors, including individual 401(k) holders and large hedge funds.
Michael Anderson, co-founder of Framework Ventures, points out that many institutions may be eager to adjust their strategies and infrastructure to accommodate the new Ethereum ETF. The entry of these funds may bring more users into the Ethereum network, especially as fund managers may not be allowed to stake the ETH they hold, prompting new investors to stake their own ETH to earn rewards.
This approval also brings clarity to Ethereum’s regulatory status. Jake Chervinsky, General Counsel at Variant, emphasizes that if these funds are allowed to trade, it may mean that un-staked ETH is not considered securities by the SEC, which could encourage more institutions to enter the market, overcoming their previous hesitations due to regulatory uncertainty.
The launch of the ETH ETF may have far-reaching implications for the Ethereum ecosystem. The potential buying pressure from these funds would benefit Ethereum and Layer 2 solutions. Ethereum’s token burning mechanism, which burns tokens with each transaction, may see a new deflationary trend if trading volume increases due to ETF-driven market dynamics.
The impact on the staking economy is another key area to watch. As platforms like Lido make it easier for individuals to stake ETH, the removal of more ETH from circulation due to ETFs may exacerbate concerns about the centralization of staked ETH.
The approval of the ETH ETF is equivalent to an endorsement of Ethereum and may solidify its leadership position. Michael Anderson suggests that even a fraction of institutional funds flowing into Bitcoin ETFs would consolidate Ethereum’s market share and valuation dominance.
This development may also create opportunities for other blockchains such as Cardano, Solana, and Ripple. However, these blockchains face additional regulatory hurdles. While Ethereum’s status with the SEC remains unclear, assets like Solana’s SOL and Cardano’s ADA have been explicitly classified as securities, complicating their path to ETF approval.
Financial institutions like CME play a crucial role in the adoption of Bitcoin and Ethereum futures. Other cryptocurrencies would need similar support from financial institutions to achieve similar adoption, and this prospect is currently uncertain.
ETF
ETH
SEC